![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And that will most probably be all that I have to say about that! |
Did she just say an "audio enema?" I know the music is good but...
*sigh* Today was a good day. :) |
Quote:
But then again, there is much about life in this country and in the world in the later half of the 20th Century and the early 21st Century that they wouldn't recognize and couldn't have imagined. As far as that goes, did they foresee the Civil War and its aftermath, which probably did more to shift the nature of the Republic than any other single event in our history? An answer might also depend in part in exactly what aspect of the Republic one has in mind when answering the question. I think frequently what is implied in the question is "Would they recognize the expanded role of the federal government?" But I would suggest that there's more to it than that -- for example, would they recognize a Republic in which women, blacks and non-land owners can vote and hold office? I think the relevant, if unanswerable, question is whether they would see the Republic as it exists today as a logical evolution appropriate for the context in which it exists. As to that, each speculator's mileage may differ. More answer than you wanted to your rhetorical question, I know. :D |
^And yet, a worthy opinion. I've often selected one or another historical figure, and wondered what he or she would think of today.
|
Quote:
|
Mystic Cat your post is right on!
Quote:
|
Quote:
Well said, MysticCat. Our Founding Fathers could never have imagined the things we deal with today, where government deals heavily with social issues and the world is so diverse and interconnected. I sometimes wonder how Washington, Franklin, and Jefferson would have dealt with the issues of global instability or radicalism; or how Lincoln and Kennedy would have dealt with gay rights and other social issues. |
Quote:
But I like your response, that if they could see the evolution as a whole, I think they would at least understand why we are where we are. Let's make no mistake though, it's not the past four years that have made a significant difference since the founding era. |
Quote:
Quote:
On another topic, I don't care at all the Beyoncé lip-synced, and her performance didn't annoy me nearly as much as some others I've heard, but I wish that just once at an event like an inauguration, whoever sings the national anthem would be content to sing it the way it was written, without needing to make it "their own." Sometimes, it's really not about the singer. |
When she first started, I said to my son "I think she's lip synching." I don't really care if they lip synch but I like the National Anthem best when it is sung as it was written. I'm a traditionalist though... I think pizza should always have cheese and pepperoni. I like ritual and the expected in many situations.
|
My daughter was there. They had a good spot right in the front/middle of the "free" area. She was so cold by the time everything started...they got there at 5 am. It was very inspirational, but she said she's never going again...too many people packed too close together.
She said no one liked the poet. So, this is one of the things she's been doing instead of finishing her recruitment story. ;) |
I told Hypo that her new aspiration should be inaugural poet since poetry is the genre that wins her awards. She said nobody she was watching with liked that one. And I told her "Exactly! You can do way better than him!"
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.