AOII Angel |
06-16-2012 04:12 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchkin03
(Post 2152842)
But there are 15 times as many PC diagnoses in the US. So, doesn't that mean the mortality rate for cervical cancer is higher than that for prostate cancer? It's probably the case for both types of cancer that early detection would cut the mortality rate even more.
|
Most men by the age of 70 will have a diagnosis of prostate cancer, and in fact in autopsy series, prostate cancer is found in almost all men over that age. It is not the cause of death, however. Prostate cancer comes in two flavors, aggressive and indolent. Pretty much the same thing happens in breast cancer. They are both cancers of aging. The indolent variety is just there and doesn't cause any problems and probably doesn't need to be treated. The problem is that it is difficult to figure out who has aggressive and who has indolent prostates cancer. They are now recommending that men not be screened for prostate cancer because the treatment is so aggressive and unnecessary for the vast majority of the patients diagnosed with prostate cancer who would have otherwise gone on to die of something else, never having suffered from their disease. Cervical cancer screening, however, has been a big success, and the natural history is very different because the disease is a viral based cancer rather than a hormonally fed cancer such as prostate and breast cancer.
|