DrPhil |
05-29-2012 10:40 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by iotamason
(Post 2148962)
Didn't you tell me in another thread to read the posts instead of just responding earlier..
|
LOL. As with that other thread, you have interesting comprehension:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ME
Perhaps you were not but that is what other people believe will happen because of these cases. That is why people like myself respond as we do.
|
This means that you did not say (and you did not mean to imply) that rape accusations should not be taken seriously at the onset (prior to the guilty verdict). Other people believe that rape accusations will not (or should not) be taken seriously because of the relatively rare instances that people lie. Therefore, whenever someone says "she has hurt the credibility of every future rape accuser going forward...but with women like Gibson out there it will always be doubt about these claims" (with and without the "rape is a serious charge and men who commit it should be thrown under the jail" disclaimer***), it receives a certain response from some people.
*** Some people apply the above disclaimer to guilty verdicts but the alleged rape victim is still stigmatized and treated like crap. That is also why certain comments receive a type of response.
Quote:
Originally Posted by iotamason
(Post 2148967)
No way that there could be GCers' with such a skewed view to make this topic into a gender or race war instead of an intelligent discussion.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by iotamason
(Post 2148962)
to be honest yes i am new to the GC culture....
|
Indeed you are relatively new.
|