![]() |
People should just hush up already. This is how they choose to live their lives, and as far as I've seen on the show (though of course I don't know them personally) they are not horrible crazy people.
That said, they did choose to be apart of the show and had to have known that it would cause some drama. But, as I'm guessing was the purpose of the show, I have learned a lot about their lifestyle. Far be it from me to judge them. Then again, I thought they moved to Vegas, so who cares about Utah anymore? |
Well, in most states according to the law, since he's only married to one woman, he's not a true "bigamist", correct?
How many children are born out of traditional wedlock in this country today? Among some cultural subgroups, up to 70%. Are the parents of these children in jail because they're not married? Not that I'm aware of. I think that these women are a few bricks shy of a load because of their choices, but they seem to take good care of their children and the family as it is currently made up. I think Cody or Kody or whatever his name is thinks he's the cock of the walk. He is the cock of the walk in his house, but not so much everywhere else. Where did he work, and what did he do to support his harem and offspring? Whatever it was, he got there and back in a two seater sport car that made HIM look "good". I have read extensively that many of these rogue polygamists work the system to get welfare and food stamps. If that is the case with this bunch, then I say hang em high. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I think important here is they're not arguing for legalization of polygamy in the sense of state recognition, they're arguing for decriminalization of polygamy as long as it doesn't involve legal bigamy or having two marriage licenses.
Quote:
Quote:
|
does this law in Utah also apply to two people who are separated but not divorced from their legal partners and live together?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJYn3BoZkcQ |
I guess I'll just take another step beyond Kevin's point ... historically, the two main legal reasons for outlawing polygamy have been:
1 - The high incidence of multiple marriages and marrying extremely young women, along with the attendant pressures to marry; and 2 - The difficulty of creating a legal accord between more than two people in the same sense of marriage. Additionally: -The Christian definition of "marriage" as one man and one woman. So considering that we have considerably more resources to protect children, and we are in a position to open legal definitions of marriage across the board ... is it time to rethink polygamy? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Both of those are still illegal, child abuse in particular. Since manipulation and abuse occur in monogamous and heterosexual relationships it's hard to lay the blame at the feet of polygamy even if that is its historical existence in the US. I'm not pro religious fundies, but the antipolygamy law was primarily an anti-LDS law. As much as they're on my shitlist and I think their religioun is, um, out there, that's not a really good reason to target them. Child abuse is though, and that should be prosecuted. |
Quote:
If memory serves me correctly each wife has her own wing in the house where she lives with her children, correct? Whose to say, that the sexual encounters with the "spiritual" relationships aren't casual? He never spends two consecutive nights with one woman, right? Commitment implies consecutive nights in the same bed. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And the fact that he specifically said he's spiritually married to the other women on national TV puts lie to any argument to the contrary. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:03 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.