![]() |
Why all the legalistic threads all of a sudden (not just this OP)? It's not even rush season.
ETA: I guess it is about the time when all the new, idealistic rush chairs start planning fall rush. ;) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
From the MOI: All Styles [of recruitment]: No favors or gifts may be given to women by the fraternity and/or individual members. However, it's less clear that something like taking PNM's to a $300 spa day would be against the rules, and I think that's 33girl's point. |
I've known of chapters to simply accept that they'll have rush infractions, and build the anticipated fines into their budgets. I wonder if, instead of the fine being paid to campus Panhellenic, the fine was divided among all non-dirty-rushing chapters and paid to them at the end of recruitment. You reckon that would reduce the amount of planned infractions? (Not saying it's allowed, just wondering.)
|
Quote:
|
On the campus I advise on, the universities own the housing and select the groups that have housing and who gets what house (some houses are nicer than others). One of the deterrents to dirty rushing is if you have multiple infractions, your GLO could potentially loose their house for the following year and be moved into a suite or be moved into a less desirable house (No sorority wants a house that belonged to a fratenity for 5 years. Its just gross.)
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I would think social penalties - i.e., no mixers, semi-formals, formals, etc. - might be best as they don't violate NPC agreements and would hurt enough to get chapters' attention.
|
Quote:
|
While it would be a hardship, it would be a relatively minor one, and in fact that chapter would probably end up with a really strong sisterhood if they played it right. The social aspect is important, but not the most important.
Fines are TOO painless - and if they aren't, then the social aspect would be severely curtailed just because of budgetary constraints. I would also be willing to bet that come next recruitment that chapter would think twice about breaking the rules. |
Fines are okay - but only for late lists, etc. They cannot be used for dirty rushing. But, I do love the idea of using the fines as a 'pay out' to chapters without violations. That's freakin awesome!
Here's another issue: I would love to see a recruitment budget for a chapter be cut as a sanction. Now I know fines cannot be issued as punishment, but telling a chapter that they cannot spend as much would be the reverse of that. So, would that be acceptable? The only issue I could see with that is this: our Panhellenic-mandated recruitment guidelines state that each chapter's recruitment budget cannot exceed $2,500. (I've got an issue with them telling us how much we can spend out of our own budget, but that's an issue for another day...) Well, that $2,500 limit is (and has been for years and year) a huge joke because most chapters I know have at minimum 2x that much in their chapter budgets for it and some in excess of 3x!! Once you account for food, supplies for philanthropy arts & crafts and rentals of things like tables & chairs, you're over budget without even factoring in the pretties like flowers. So, the Panhellenic is kidding themselves that chapters will keep expenditures at or under $2,500 during recruitment...but I've love to see them try to enforce an even lower budget. Thoughts? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:14 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.