Originally Posted by KSig RC (Post 1990957)

It really would be interesting - especially considering that discussion of this type is generally considered more "masculine" (even though in my experience and my limited understanding of the research, women discuss [truthful] sexual escapades much more often and in far greater detail). Particularly with her extended discussion of donger size and the male's aggressiveness, I almost feel like a male 'equivalent' discussion would be derided as the "usual chauvinist piggery" or whatever by some, and straight-up applauded by others.

The comparisons some sites have made between her and Tucker Max are particularly telling, since the two have almost nothing in common in terms of writing style or goal.

Ultimately, it's awkward and kind of funny, and likely terrible for her because everything lives on the internet forever. The job offers etc. will be fleeting - grandkids stumbling upon it is slightly more permanent. That might be the lesson, even though the feminist-supporting-man-dude inside of me would like there to be a larger one. HA LARGER ONE - TAKE THAT, RED SOX PROSPECT EXCORIATED IN PRINT!

Originally Posted by ColdInCanada11 (Post 1990985)

Am I the only person who wondered how, in her senior year, she actually had time to make this??

Originally Posted by KSig RC (Post 1990957)

The comparisons some sites have made between her and Tucker Max are particularly telling, since the two have almost nothing in common in terms of writing style or goal.

Originally Posted by Always AlphaGam (Post 1990999)

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe this "study" took 4 years to complete.

Originally Posted by christiangirl (Post 1991006)

*This girl is a moron.
*It sounds like most of this sex was unprotected.
*I can't believe she had the nerve to call one of the guys a whore.
*I bet when she goes to apply for those post grad jobs, lots and lots of employers remember her name from Yahoo! News.

Originally Posted by Kevin (Post 1991023)

I don't know what to think of her. This is just another life lesson about how you need to control what is published on the internet under your name.

Originally Posted by Tulip86 (Post 1991029)

insinuating another woman is a whore (unless she got paid to have sex) is never o.k. in my opinion...

Originally Posted by pshsx1 (Post 1991035)

This is awesome.

Originally Posted by knight_shadow (Post 1991034)

Is 'slut' more acceptable, since there was no exchange of funds (just fluids)?

Originally Posted by Tulip86 (Post 1991038)

LOL a bit more acceptable yes

and to each their own opinion, I just don't appreciate people calling women whores when they have quite some bedpartners, while men can get away with the same behavior being called a hero.