GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   News & Politics (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=207)
-   -   State of the Union Address (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=110853)

Kappamd 01-27-2010 11:28 PM

I didn't say there was anything wrong with it. It was just an awkward moment when they chose not to react.

^^My bad. The way the media played it, it seemed like it was a big deal.

DrPhil 01-27-2010 11:32 PM

I saw you Marcia L. Fudge, Esq. OOO-OOOP! :)

DrPhil 01-27-2010 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Senusret I (Post 1890192)
They are not supposed to, neither is the supreme court.

The Supreme Court looked very...supreme. And regal.

LucyKKG 01-27-2010 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dreamseeker (Post 1890166)
op ur poll needs another option :p

I went with the 3rd option, cause I felt it was most like what I'm thinking now. I'm not going to watch it at all. Eh.

Psi U MC Vito 01-27-2010 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by moe.ron (Post 1890191)
Trying to figure out a drinking game to the Obama's State of the Union. It's never going to be as fun as Bush's State of the Union.

What's wrong with Gays serving in the military?

Currently there is a policy known as Don't Ask, Don't Tell which means that LGBT can serve in the military, but have to hide their orientation. Part of Obama's campaign promises was to get rid of that policy. For those watching, is he actually going to do so?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Senusret I (Post 1890192)
They are not supposed to, neither is the supreme court.

To expand on this, The military is supposed to publicly support any foreign policy he makes, but have no interest in domestic policy. IIRC that is.

Kappamd 01-27-2010 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psi U MC Vito (Post 1890199)
Currently there is a policy known as Don't Ask, Don't Tell which means that LGBT can serve in the military, but have to hide their orientation. Part of Obama's campaign promises was to get rid of that policy. For those watching, is he actually going to do so?


To expand on this, The military is supposed to publicly support any foreign policy he makes, but have no interest in domestic policy. IIRC that is.

I seriously doubt it.

And seriously Republicans, could you have been any more obvious with your selection of people to sit behind the governor?

moe.ron 01-27-2010 11:45 PM

Anybody figure out a drinking game for Obama's State of the Union yet?

Psi U MC Vito 01-27-2010 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kappamd (Post 1890205)
I seriously doubt it.

And seriously Republicans, could you have been any more obvious with your selection of people to sit behind the governor?

Sorry I meant did he said he was going to do so. And since we are on the subject, is DADT currently a matter of law or DoD policy?

ADqtPiMel 01-27-2010 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by moe.ron (Post 1890207)
Anybody figure out a drinking game for Obama's State of the Union yet?

http://wonkette.com/413400/celebrate...more-413400%23

moe.ron 01-27-2010 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psi U MC Vito (Post 1890208)
Sorry I meant did he said he was going to do so. And since we are on the subject, is DADT currently a matter of law or DoD policy?

Policy

Psi U MC Vito 01-27-2010 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by moe.ron (Post 1890210)
Policy

Actually I looked it up and it is indeed part of the United States Code. So it is up to Congress to repeal it.

christiangirl 01-27-2010 11:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1890179)
I caught it when my homies McCain, Lieberman, and them were standing and clapping. There were so many standing ovations that it was sickening.

I noticed some people leaping out of their seats to clap right BEFORE he said the inspiring part. I wondered if they were telepathic or something.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Psi U MC Vito (Post 1890199)
For those watching, is he actually going to do so?

I think he will, but that doesn't mean anything will change. Legislature changes law, not feelings. When you're facing a high-charged situation like that, knowing full-well what the military attitude is, "official policy" means crap.

I'm looking at Facebook and see people are talking smack about the speech already (on Facebook). That would be fine, but these particular people have made it clear that they "refused to watch." :rolleyes: Um, if you didn't hear ANY of it, what exactly are you commenting on?

DrPhil 01-28-2010 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by christiangirl (Post 1890212)
Um, if you didn't hear ANY of it, what exactly are you commenting on?

The same thing that fans of Obama who didn't watch are commenting on: How they feel about Obama, political parties, etc.

moe.ron 01-28-2010 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psi U MC Vito (Post 1890211)
Actually I looked it up and it is indeed part of the United States Code. So it is up to Congress to repeal it.

Ouw, my mistake.

christiangirl 01-28-2010 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1890213)
The same thing that fans of Obama who didn't watch are commenting on: How they feel about Obama, political parties, etc.

Which is equally dumb, IMO. Comment on what you know, but it's not a good idea to pass judgement (good or bad) on something you didn't even hear.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.