KSig RC |
10-07-2008 02:44 PM |
Wait, we're really concerned that the all-important "community organizer" vote is being disparaged by a group that, for all intents and purposes, doesn't cater to the community being organized?
Obama's background as a community organizer is fair game, as is Palin's PTA experience/exceptionally short rise to governor. Especially when you consider the cozy relationships between many of the organizations that use COs and political parties, it really doesn't seem all that different from a community-based lobbyist, or a party-level worker. That can be worthwhile experience, or it can be grooming for future positions, or any variety of things.
I simply can't see rhetoric attacking Obama's background as causing some sort of uprising among community activists against McCain - foremost, because those who would be most upset likely aren't voting for him, and on a shallower level, because of cognitive dissonance and the fact that many people won't personalize the comparison unless they're already looking to be upset.
It actually seems like a relatively safe play by the GOP, because it's tough to combat - "no, seriously, I did great work in the community" . . . see how disingenuous that sounds? It's the "I'm a good driver" corollary - if Obama has to say it for himself, it's likely not true, so he won't, and he'll (correctly) hope his record speaks for itself. It gives a somewhat solid, certainly unopposed soundbite, one that is ultimately high in calories but low in substance. I just don't see any risk - similar to Obama using a youth movement, something that has incredibly high upside (both in terms of utility and cost/benefit) and only insipid potential for downside in the eyes of people who wouldn't vote for him anyway.
|