![]() |
You can like recruitment stories and not feed the narcissism. The fewer "OMG MORE MORE MORE" posts we have, the less posters will demand with "oh I guess no one is reading..." I comment on stuff that I find worth commenting on, but I don't need to beg people to continue.
|
I agree with violetpretty and many others who have posted above. I think I posted on a few stories saying I wanted more, but there are many others who are over zealous with constant posting. On the other hand, people who post stating they have interest might help the retro stories post more frequently or give the original poster more confidence that people are actually interested and that there is a reason for them to be posting.
I am not plugging for any story including my own. I am only trying to say there is a fine line between stating interest for the poster and feeding narcissism. |
In case you were wondering, WCsweet<3, I am enjoying your story.
|
Quote:
'stunnedgirl' if you are that irritated, do what everyone is saying and STOP reading recruitment threads. It will save you from being worked up. |
Apparently I'm the only one sitting around wondering who "stunnedgirl" is. :o
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
First of all, if I was the one who started the Totally honest type thread (I wrote my retro story about a year ago that featured a rush that took place in the 1970s) that seems to have taken a turn: I apologize. In my case (the story was told fairly quickly) I had messages to today's pnm that included: don't be put off by a sorority's reputation, religious tolerance/diversity, and that things work out. The narcissitic turn...is unbearable. I view these threads (the honest, real time or soon thereafter) not as a "brag book" but as an educational chance to give girls some information on rush, how to rush, and how to get started in college life. But, I will say that I have seen the trend that if a pnm says something "wrong" or lacks discretions...some of the ladies really jump all over them. Silence is sometimes a preferable thing. If a girl says that...ABC has ugly girls, an ugly house and/or just plain lame....let the child be. She's got more issues than can be addressed in any forum.
My daughter, who will rush next fall, read a few threads. (Since she is 18 she doesn't feel the need to discuss everything with me...and that is fine.) Daughter did say that she knows she needs recs, knows a bit about the school that she is rushing in, and that she thinks that she'll do fine whatever happens). |
Quote:
I can think of several posters, actually. They are the ones that if you review all of their posts, they have nothing to say on this board other than to comment on the Recruitment Stories. What do they say? "More, more" "I'm hooked" "Where are you, we want more" "Are you coming back" "I'm dyyyyyyyyyyyyying" "Thanks" "Congratulations to you and XYZ" That is the extent of how they post. Nothing is more annoying than having to weed through uninsightful comments. I read recruitment stories, but not every day. It's not because of the OPs; it's for the stupid-ass comments that don't add to the story. Off My Soap Box |
The only one of those that is not bad is the congratulatory posts, IMO. Once those pop up, the thread is basically over, so you don't have to sift through anything. Plus, congrats are due.
|
Quote:
Ditto! |
Quote:
I tend to somewhat agree with this. I think that there are enough advice threads warning PNMs to use discretion, and telling them that the things they say in their threads can have a negative affect on their recruitment. If they ignore that advice and choose to insult chapters in their threads (yes, there's a line between honest feedback and insults), put out all sorts of identifying information and just be totally indiscrete, we should just let them, and see what happens. Sometimes I think we're being a little too nice by jumping in and telling PNMs their mistakes. |
Quote:
Most people don't read all the threads when they start posting here. Unfortunately. But those who do and still say things like "XYZ seem really slutty" - yeah, let them hang themselves. The problem is you don't know who did and who didn't. |
Quote:
|
Since we're on a venting spree about the recruitment threads, can somebody give me an accurate definintion of "Retro"? Being an older poster, I enjoy reading experiences similar to my own and then get upset when retro is defined by the poster as 2006. Can we please establish a clear definition for this along with the term "brutally honest"?
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.