![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Anyone have a strong (relatively unbiased) hunch which group it is going to be?
|
Quote:
|
My money is on 2 at once with the other 2 slated for a later date, maybe 2015 or 16? And since I have no horse in this race, I'm going to guess ADPi and Alpha Phi, for no reason whatsoever. Well, except I think AGD might be fully committed right now. They might make sense for a 2015 or later colony though. Maybe they'll do Arkansas one better and colonize 3 at once, with one to come in a few years.
|
Obviously I'm rooting for ADPi. Our chapter there closed in the late 90's (96 or 98 I believe). Since I wasn't there for presentations, who knows. It is in the hands of Panhellenic at Ole Miss now. We shall see.
|
How in the world are they going to decide? Such strong groups!
|
Quote:
|
I would like to see the following:
1) delay the announcement until recruitment is complete. 2) bring on all four at once. Seriously. How impressive and exciting would THAT be? Trail blazing; it would set the bar really high. Not to mention, it'd certainly shake a few trees. Okay: now I'll wait for all the naysaying posts, but since you're all from the South, if you flame me, I expect it will be so gentle and subtle that my Western brain won't even process it. I do love all of you guys, I do! I have learned so much from my Southern sisters... sigh... but I will always always always be a California girl, even if I was born in TN. Panhellenically yours, AzTheta! |
AzTheta, I agree. The system can accommodate that much growth. This adds to my thinking that they will wait until after Arkansas is done. If it goes well (and we're all assuming it's going to be more than fine), they will feel more confident to go outside the box a little.
|
Quote:
I'm all for expansion at Ole Miss (and lots of other places), but I think biting off too much at once will inevitably cause one or more of the new chapters to fail. That would be tragic considering the cost to colonize. |
Quote:
I understand the thinking that two groups at once helps avoid some sort of stigma attached to a single new group, but we've seen lots of successful colonizations in the SEC in recent years, and I'm not sure that the new kid necessarily comes in at a disadvantage. Often, it seems, many women would prefer the new group over one that has a less popular reputation. ETA: I didn't realize there are only 9 groups there now. That means that every new group is a serious hit to quota (over 10%). |
I think bringing on 4 at once would create more opportunity for stigma than letting each group have their moment in the sun. I think it might be more plausible to bring on 2 and then stack the other 2 for future expansion if conditions are still favorable. If I were one of the 4 presenting and all 4 were chosen, I would back out.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:10 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.