GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   Greek Life (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=24)
-   -   Phi Kappa Psi at U of Virginia Voluntarily Suspends Activities (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=144769)

SOM 12-05-2014 07:50 PM

Show this graphic to anyone who says rape isn't a real issue in America http://www.vox.com/2014/12/5/7342489...lence-graphic#

SOM 12-05-2014 08:07 PM

Rolling Stone’s Botched Account of a UVA Gang Rape Does a Disservice to Rape Victims http://reason.com/blog/2014/12/05/ro...b015b03a3dc9e4 via @reason

SOM 12-05-2014 08:08 PM

Rolling Stone’s UVA Rape Story Is Falling Apart and It’s a Damn Shame http://po.st/ex8EJD via @po_st

SOM 12-05-2014 09:29 PM

The lesson of Rolling Stone and UVA: protecting victims means checking their stories http://www.vox.com/2014/12/5/7341973...icle-share-top

1964Alum 12-05-2014 11:50 PM

I don't think RS rolling back the story is the final curtain on this. The initial story hit a very raw nerve with alumni, students, faculty, parents, and community members throughout Virginia as reports of incidents such as this one have been going on for years. I, myself, heard of parents' concerns based on reports from their offspring well before the RS story.

President Sullivan issued a statement today, as did Attorney General Mark Herring. Investigations will continue.

Excerpted from President Sullivan's statement:

The University of Virginia is aware of today’s reports from the Washington Post and the statement from Rolling Stone magazine.
The University remains first and foremost concerned with the care and support of our students and, especially, any survivor of sexual assault. Our students, their safety, and their wellbeing, remain our top priority.
Over the past two weeks, our community has been more focused than ever on one of the most difficult and critical issues facing higher education today: sexual violence on college campuses. Today’s news must not alter this focus.





http://news.virginia.edu/content/sta...eresa-sullivan


And from Attorney General Mark Herring as posted on FB:



Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring called on Rolling Stone to take steps to correct errors in the story rather than simply issuing a walk-back statement.
"It is deeply troubling that Rolling Stone magazine is now publicly walking away from its central story line in its bombshell report on the University of Virginia without correcting what errors its editors believe were made," Herring said in a statement. "Virginians are now left grasping for the truth, but we must not let that undermine our support for survivors of sexual assault or the momentum for solutions."

honorgal 12-06-2014 12:28 AM

What a shit show.

And my guess is it probably is the final curtain. In the sense that nothing will change. It's like Groundhog Day.

ASTalumna06 12-06-2014 01:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pinksequins (Post 2301517)
We don't know that it is all false, just that there were sufficient substantive inaccuracies to cause even valid elements to be called into question.

This. I guess I'm not understanding why everyone is now assuming that the entire story is false..?

Quote:

Originally Posted by SOM (Post 2301516)
Sabrina Rubin Erdely, woman behind Rolling Stone’s explosive U-Va. alleged rape story http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifest...984_story.html

I think this is the real issue here, regardless of whether or not Jackie's story is true:

Quote:

The story does take one journalistic shortcut. The alleged assault, described in graphic detail, is presented largely without traditional qualifiers, such as “according to Jackie” or “allegedly.” The absence of such attribution or qualification leaves the impression that the events in question are undisputed facts, rather than accusations. Erdely said, however, that her writing style makes it clear that the events are being told from Jackie’s point of view.

ETA:

#IStandWithJackie: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...ent/?tid+sm_fb

Some of the Twitter posts in the link are exactly what I was thinking. What makes everyone automatically think that the fraternity isn't lying? Rape is traumatic; Jackie even said she couldn't see clearly in the room. Perhaps she couldn't remember the exact number of people who were there?

The fact that Rolling Stone completely backed away from the story is awful. They should have at least explained what had been called into question, instead of implying that Jackie was lying about the whole thing.

honorgal 12-06-2014 01:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASTalumna06 (Post 2301546)
This. I guess I'm not understanding why everyone is now assuming that the entire story is false..?




I think this is the real issue here, regardless of whether or not Jackie's story is true:




ETA:

#IStandWithJackie: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...ent/?tid+sm_fb

Some of the Twitter posts in the link are exactly what I was thinking. What makes everyone automatically think that the fraternity isn't lying? Rape is traumatic; Jackie even said she couldn't see clearly in the room. Perhaps she couldn't remember the exact number of people who were there?

The fact that Rolling Stone completely backed away from the story is awful. They should have at least explained what had been called into question, instead of implying that Jackie was lying about the whole thing.

Read the Washington Post article. I think someone else linked to it already. They've re-reported the story, sent reporters and fact-checkers to Charlottesville over the last week or so, and did the job that Rolling Stone utterly failed to do. They reported that even Jackie's advocate friends no longer believe her account.

What part of the story do you still think is true?

honorgal 12-06-2014 01:18 AM

Here it is:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/...bdc_story.html

1964Alum 12-06-2014 01:57 AM

The RS UVA story is but one part of the investigation picture. And has nothing to do with the more intensive Title IX investigation into UVA along with ten or so other schools where a more intensive investigation has been called for. BEFORE the RS article. The investigation by the Charlottesville PD as well as that which the Attorney General has authorized will continue.

Should Phi Kappa Psi bring a defamation suit, there will also be a discovery process which may or may not bring in witnesses that have not as yet come forward but may have to if they are subpoenaed. The fraternity may well be advised to stay miles away from that.

That there has been a problem at UVA has been known for years and years And is why the RS article was found credible by the community in the first place.

Hopefully something beneficial and constructive will come of this. Including restitution to any and all who have been defamed. But also of enhanced security for students on campus. The issue of illegal underage drinking at UVA is also getting a careful look. I imagine that a bill will be introduced in the VA General Assembly when it convenes to remove adjudication of serious rape allegations from colleges and universities. Only time will tell how all of this will play out and what changes will be put into place.

ASTalumna06 12-06-2014 02:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by honorgal (Post 2301547)
Read the Washington Post article. I think someone else linked to it already. They've re-reported the story, sent reporters and fact-checkers to Charlottesville over the last week or so, and did the job that Rolling Stone utterly failed to do. They reported that even Jackie's advocate friends no longer believe her account.

What part of the story do you still think is true?

Quote:

Originally Posted by honorgal (Post 2301548)

Yes, I read it.

Quote:

the fraternity said there was no event at the house the night the attack was alleged to have happened.
Oh, well if the fraternity says that then it must be true...

Quote:

A student who came to Jackie’s aid the night of the alleged attack said in an interview late Friday night that she did not appear physically injured at the time but was visibly shaken and told him and two other friends that she had been at a fraternity party and had been forced to have oral sex with a group of men. They offered to get her help and she said she just wanted to return to her dorm, said the student, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject.
And they couldn't just be covering their butts to not sound like callous a-holes?

Quote:

an alleged attacker that Jackie identified to them for the first time this week — a junior in 2012 who worked with her as a university lifeguard — was actually the name of a student who belongs to a different fraternity, and no one by that name has been a member of Phi Kappa Psi.
Maybe Jackie thought he was a member of Phi Kappa Psi, but in reality he wasn't?

Quote:

The prominent fraternity… said in its statement Friday that its “initial doubts as to the accuracy of the article have only been strengthened as alumni and undergraduate members have delved deeper.”
This doesn't tell us much.

Quote:

The fraternity also said… that the house does not have pledges during the fall semester.
I know chapters that have taken "underground pledges" when those pledges couldn't actually participate because of grades, first-semester freshman status, etc.


All I'm saying is that it's fascinating to me how everyone was so quick to say how awful this fraternity chapter is, and now in a matter of hours and a few news stories later, they're saying how the chapter is completely innocent and Jackie is a liar.

And wasn't there another alleged victim who came forward this week about being raped at the same fraternity house decades ago?

ETA: Question… did Phi Kappa Psi make a public statement prior to Rolling Stone retracting their statements/article?

honorgal 12-06-2014 02:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASTalumna06 (Post 2301552)
Yes, I read it.



Oh, well if the fraternity says that then it must be true...



And they couldn't just be covering their butts to not sound like callous a-holes?



Maybe Jackie thought he was a member of Phi Kappa Psi, but in reality he wasn't?



This doesn't tell us much.



I know chapters that have taken "underground pledges" when those pledges couldn't actually participate because of grades, first-semester freshman status, etc.


All I'm saying is that it's fascinating to me how everyone was so quick to say how awful this fraternity chapter is, and now in a matter of hours and a few news stories later, they're saying how the chapter is completely innocent and Jackie is a liar.

And wasn't there another alleged victim who came forward this week about being raped at the same fraternity house decades ago?

ETA: Question… did Phi Kappa Psi make a public statement prior to Rolling Stone retracting their statements/article?

Yes, there is another victim from UVA and she has spoken out. She's not alleged, she's a victim, her rapist was eventually caught and confessed. But yes, it was decades ago, so not seeing how that is relevant as evidence that Jackie's allegation must be true.

I think Phi Psi made some kind of statement but it wasn't much, why?

ASTalumna06 12-06-2014 03:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by honorgal (Post 2301554)
Yes, there is another victim from UVA and she has spoken out. She's not alleged, she's a victim, her rapist was eventually caught and confessed. But yes, it was decades ago, so not seeing how that is relevant as evidence that Jackie's allegation must be true.

I think Phi Psi made some kind of statement but it wasn't much, why?

I'm simply pointing out that there's a chance this chapter isn't completely innocent.

Again...

Quote:

All I'm saying is that it's fascinating to me how everyone was so quick to say how awful this fraternity chapter is, and now in a matter of hours and a few news stories later, they're saying how the chapter is completely innocent and Jackie is a liar.
I tend not to believe much on the internet anymore. People comment and speak in such absolutes and are so sure of themselves without all the facts. And that doesn't just apply to this story.

I'll wait to hear more before jumping to conclusions one way or the other.

honorgal 12-06-2014 03:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1964Alum (Post 2301550)
The RS UVA story is but one part of the investigation picture. And has nothing to do with the more intensive Title IX investigation into UVA along with ten or so other schools where a more intensive investigation has been called for. BEFORE the RS article. The investigation by the Charlottesville PD as well as that which the Attorney General has authorized will continue.

Should Phi Kappa Psi bring a defamation suit, there will also be a discovery process which may or may not bring in witnesses that have not as yet come forward but may have to if they are subpoenaed. The fraternity may well be advised to stay miles away from that.

That there has been a problem at UVA has been known for years and years And is why the RS article was found credible by the community in the first place.

Hopefully something beneficial and constructive will come of this. Including restitution to any and all who have been defamed. But also of enhanced security for students on campus. The issue of illegal underage drinking at UVA is also getting a careful look. I imagine that a bill will be introduced in the VA General Assembly when it convenes to remove adjudication of serious rape allegations from colleges and universities. Only time will tell how all of this will play out and what changes will be put into place.

It's obvious you really care about the University of Virginia, so I have a question.

From the RS article:

"She was having an especially difficult time figuring out how to process that awful night, because her small social circle seemed so underwhelmed. For the first month of school, Jackie had latched onto a crew of lighthearted social strivers, and her pals were now impatient for Jackie to rejoin the merriment. "You're still upset about that?" Andy asked one Friday night when Jackie was crying. Cindy, a self-declared hookup queen, said she didn't see why Jackie was so bent out of shape. "Why didn't you have fun with it?" Cindy asked. "A bunch of hot Phi Psi guys?" One of Jackie's friends told her, unconcerned, "Andy said you had a bad experience at a frat, and you've been a baby ever since."

Does this sound like it would be a remotely plausible reaction to a brutal gang rape by 7 men? Is this the typical UVA student? If so, it's monsterous.

I had friends who went to UVA and visited there when I was in college. My grandfather went there, and my parents both attended schools in VA (W & L and Randolph Macon). A number of my friends kids have attended over the years, including a half dozen who are current students. I've always loved and admired the school. But those comments are just unrecognizable from my impressions.

1964Alum 12-06-2014 04:13 AM

This whole world is a strange and bizarre one to me. I had never heard the term "roofie" until all this emerged. And I was shocked to hear what students at UVA today were telling their parents after the disappearance of young Hannah who was eventually found murdered. As it turned out, the alleged perp had had rape allegations brought against him before coming to C'ville and nothing came of any of them. One of them was at Liberty College, the school Falwell started. If I remember correctly, the other was also a religious college. What these parents were telling me bore absolutely no resemblance to anything I had either encountered or heard about during my college days as a Greek. And also Secty. of the Student Body, where I kept a pretty close watch on what was going on on campus. These same parents were also somewhat incredulous when I told them that this was not going on in the Greek world on campus back in the day! The most that ever happened was that a certain frat would spike its punch with Everclear, something virtually everyone knew about. Also some "men" on campus would try to get their dates drunk so as to have their way with her. One night "Hook ups" were not heard of or certainly were not a common way of handling ones social life. So hearing this about UVA as well as another large university up the road -which is supposed to be worse- came as a shock to me.

Only one of our four joined a fraternity, and he flunked out of college after doing nothing but hang out at his frat house all day and drink beer. (He since then has had his "Come to Jesus" moment, returned to school graduating with high honors, and is now employed as a detective in a municipal police department.) The others wanted nothing to do with the Greek system. Nor have the children of our friends. Or other college-aged children in my extended family. They never told me any specifics, just made it clear that they wanted nothing to to with it. Nor were they into the nightly party culture which clearly DOES exist on many campuses.

My husband is a graduate of an Ivy League school and had no Greek affiliation other than Phi Beta Kappa. And then was a Woodrow Wilson Scholar at another Ivy. Many of our friends are also from that background, as are many of their children or serious students elsewhere and without Greek affiliations. So the wilder part of today's campus life is not to be found within our circle of friends, including our church.

It's hard to know what a rape victim would reliably remember, particularly one who has been diagnosed with PTSD and is presumably on medication. So IMO there is much that we don't know in terms of the particulars. I do find it telling that with regard to hazing and risk management protocols, fraternities are framing it in terms of it being a financial and liability matter rather than a moral one, which they don't seem to want to touch with a ten foot pole.

I am very concerned about how the Greek community will handle this. As I have posted before, this could be used as a golden opportunity to provide leadership on campus, which would also contribute to changing the image they have, for better or for worse. And as my Phi Beta Kappa key carrying husband says, if they are smart they will do just that.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.