![]() |
Quote:
And you took out time from you busy and productive life, to peep into this thread and post 3 words, or is it two? :rolleyes: |
Quote:
I know a guy who is actually African-American. As in he was BORN in AFRICA and is now an American citizen. He finds the phenomenon funny because as he points out...and he's right...people who have been here for generation upon generation are American, plain American. In fact, anyone born here is just American. Someone born a citizen of another country who emigrates to America is fdsfdsnjk-American. I can't see why "black" could be offensive. I am "white", but I'm not white. I'm more of a tan color (naturally and made more so by way of the cancerbox in the winter:rolleyes:), but I AM "white". Doesn't offend me in the least to be called "white girl". Almost no one is WHITE or BLACK but those are easy lables that everyone understand to mean someone is of European decent or African decent. To me "African American" makes as much sense to me for kids of my generation who are in fact just American, as me saying "IrishScottishFrenchItlaianwhoknows American". I'm not. I'm American and I'm classified as "white". That's it. |
Quote:
The fact is, conquering peoples generally do some really nasty things. History shows us that, from taking the Americas by force and malice to warring tribes in Africa taking each other by the same methods. No group of people is immune to this sort of behavior if given the chance. Personally I want no part of credit for rap music. Though it originally offered a platform for political statements it's now been reduced to completely useless filth probably written by a 4th grader huffing glue. It's funny and useless for dry humping at bars and parties, but has very few redeeming qualities otherwise. There are VERY few rap ARTISTS. There are too many rappers to let the real artists shine, unfortunately. Martin Luther King was a black man and always will be remembered as such. That is the point of his contribution...to fight for basic rights for black people who were treated as second class citizens. By the way I've never heard anyone, ever, claim that Egyptians were white. The closest to is to hear that Jesus was white. Jesus was Jewish, therefore not Caucasian. As for Egyptians, here is a very concise and well-informed summary: Certainly there was some foreign admixture [in Egypt], but basically a homogeneous African population had lived in the Nile Valley from ancient to modern times... [the] Badarian people, who developed the earliest Predynastic Egyptian culture, already exhibited the mix of North African and Sub-Saharan physical traits that have typified Egyptians ever since (Hassan 1985; Yurco 1989; Trigger 1978; Keita 1990; Brace et al., this volume)... The peoples of Egypt, the Sudan, and much of East Africa, Ethiopia and Somalia are now generally regarded as a Nilotic (i.e. Nile River) continuity, with widely ranging physical features (complexions light to dark, various hair and craniofacial types) but with powerful common cultural traits, including cattle pastoralist traditions (Trigger 1978; Bard, Snowden, this volume). Language research suggests that this Saharan-Nilotic population became speakers of the Afro-Asiatic languages... Semitic was evidently spoken by Saharans who crossed the Red Sea into Arabia and became ancestors of the Semitic speakers there, possibly around 7000 BC... In summary we may say that Egypt was distinct North African culture rooted in the Nile Valley and on the Sahara.[60] |
Quote:
Also, personally if I was to move to another country, even if I lived there for the rest of my life I would still consider myself an American of African descent. I think many immigrants who live in America would agree with me on this. Can you say otherwise? |
Quote:
Didn't really read everything that was said, but it is known that European explorers of the past have made many claims that Egyptians were white. This was also accepted by most people because at the time it was believed that blacks were simply not sophisticated enough to develop such advanced civilizations. Also, I know many Jews who are in fact white, and I also have an uncle who is a black or African-American and practice the religion of Judaism. He was raised under the religion and was not a convert. I'd also be quick to put money down that most Jew's even in Israel cannot trace their family lineage in Israel back past 1948. Most would more than likely trace back to Europe, or other areas. Fact is, if I wanted to become a Jew I more than likely wouldn’t have a hard time. If I wanted to become white (unless I had Michael Jackson money) it would be next to impossible. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I prefer black because I hate when people refer to people who are black from other countries (like my mom) as African-American. I have heard people say things like "He is African-American from the Bahamas" or seen newspaper articles with things like "Thandie Newton, an African-American actress" when they fully acknowledge that she is from ENGLAND. I just drop my jaw, it's downright ignorant!
I have even heard a woman "school" a white lady in Wal-mart that she should not refer to their daughter as black because she is A-A. Well, how in the hell is the woman supposed to know? It's easier to see that someone is more likely than not black skinned, than it is to know where they are from. I am vehemently against the term African-American. I'm about as African as a Swede. On Oprah, many years ago, I saw a white lady raised in Ethiopia who currently live in the U.S. She said that she was African-American. People like this more than qualify. I, however, do not feel that I do. |
Miscreant... I'm African American!
~Katt Williams in First Sunday movie |
I am African-Native-American. Simple as that. I do not like the terms:
My roots go back to Africa and to the Blackfoot Nation of this country though I wouldn't doubt there is some Caucasian somewhere down the line of my family tree. I like the term and I find it to be an accurate term for those who have African ancestry but are American citizens, not those who are Haitian, Jamaican, Trinidadian, etc.. I don't put much energy into "correcting" people into my line of thinking because ultimately, we are all going to think what we want however, if someone were to ask me, then I will say I am A.A.-Native American. If some 90 year old woman who is still stuck in the 50's terminology (I personally know people like this of all races) says "and then the colored woman said blah blah..", I let it go. It's not worth the energy. |
I am part of the Blackfoot Nation and Cherokee tribe also, NinjaPoodle! We could be related :)
|
Quote:
I am "white", but I am not white at all. I'm a light tan. I haven't heard/met anyone who used the term "black" in an offensive manner. I have heard almost all of the other terms used either by old folks who aren't going to change their ways or by people who intend to be hateful. But I haven't heard "black" used in that manner. I'm not saying it hasn't happened, but I don't think it has a negative connotation like the racial slurs listed do. We can all think of racial slurs for every race under the sun including white, Asian, black, Hispanic...anyone and everyone. Some people in every race enjoy tearing down a different race. It's just that I haven't heard "black" nor "white" in anyone's arsenal of hateful words. Would you feel it accurate for me to call myself Scotch-Irish Italian American, as that is my "ancestry"...about 200 years or more back. European American would I guess be a more accurate analogy to African American. There are still heirlooms and bits of speech here and there in my family that have been passed down so the heritage is there, but I think people would find that description of myself inappropriate or unnecessary. I'm curious to know because for some reason this doesn't seem to translate. It's interesting to me. Also, someone else brought up an interesting point...someone who is white but was born and raised in an African country and moved to America is African-American, if the term is used correctly. There IS a place for skin color in descriptions...it's a physical characteristic. I guess that's why to me "black" and "white" make sense. Anyone with eyes knows that both descriptions are rarely absolutely correct, but it simplifies. "White" is the color of an eggshell and how many people do you know that are THAT color? Few. "Black" is the color of ink and again, how many people are that color? Few. But everyone knows "white" means a person who is Caucasian, and who is probably somewhere in the range of white to deep tan and that "black" means someone who is African and probably somewhere in the range from black to light brown. Maybe I'm idealistic, but I enjoy the idea of limiting differentiations based on race to simply physical characteristics...white, black, brown, tan, etc. But "African American" or "Asian American" to me, for someone born in the US many generations back creates a division. We're all Americans. It's different for someone who was born and raised in a foreign country and probably does owe some allegiance to their childhood home. But for those of us who have been here for generations it feels divisive to me, and it is used in an overly PC manner. Many people have given the example of a person who is of "African descent" but from another country like England or a Caribbean island being called "African American". I just find it all interesting. I think we should all form our own personal identities, but I don't feel like I'm being offensive when I call someone either "white" or "black", I guess. I don't feel obligated to differentiate between "African American", "Asian American", "European American", etc. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
There is a lot to be discussed, and the rest of my post is very long. Chill out...everyone else seems to be interested in discussion. What's the problem? |
Quote:
Good luck in finding your own answers to this question, especially on GC... :rolleyes: |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:51 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.