![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Now if some yahoo feels that they aren't man enough to make things happen either locally or on an inter/national level, then they shouldn't let that solid oak door slam them on their turncoat butt when they leave. |
Well, we've got a fairly good setup at the moment. Nationals doesn't ever send anyone to look after us, and they never attempt to punish our transgressions...We pretty much ignore things like their pledge program and what not, so thats not too big a deal. This issue comes to the forefront most every year at convention/leadership conference, when we are REQUIRED to send so many people. Now that in itself isn't bad, except that we have to generally pay several hundred dollars for every person we send. However, when we get there, we often have to teach the classes. The last conference I went to was a east coast regional conference, in which I taught ALL the pledge training classes, our treasurer taught the large majority of the financial sessions, and our rush chairmen (we have 2) led the "recruitment" sessions. I just find it pretty unnerving that our nationals will go against what we do all year, by promoting diversity, anti-"hazing" and making our fraternity more acceptable to people from all walks of life. However, come convention time, the chapters nationals hate all year are suddenly put up on a pedestal, simply because we actually have large memberships, large operating budgets, etc...
|
Plus, if you broke off, you'd no longer be entitled to the letters, ritual etc. of your former fraternity.
|
Quote:
ETA: I don't think you have to explain "old row" to me. |
Quote:
|
I think ours would actually, because the majority of the corporate execs, politicians, public figures, came from southern chapters, and really only identify with their chapter. Of all the ones I've head contact with, they talk about being at whatever school they went to, and not at all about the national org.
|
If you or your alumni don't like how your fraternity is being run, then do something to change it instead of whining about it.
Just looking at Sigma Chi's leadership on their webpage- out of the five grand officers listed, at least one is southern- he went to Baylor. Any able-minded decent business man would know that the changes being made to the greek system the past decade or so have been essential to keeping the fraternities in existence. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Now from your point of view, it appears that this may not be in the best interest *for you* and for certain other members. Again, if this is the case, then by all means quit and form your own club. No one is forcing you - collective you - to remain. Besides, there are many other organizations - fraternal and otherwise - that are available for networking, friendship and what have you. So knock yourself out and go have fun. Quote:
|
I understand the reasonability of changing our national fraternity, but we're vastly outnumbered. Its hard to fight an organization which strives for political correctness in every area. Not to mention, I doubt a CEO or congressman is willing to put himself out there for the issues we have problems with.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
What you're complaining about within the fraternity is applicable to society in general (i.e. the political correctness). |
It is applicable yes. Unfortunately our alumni give most of their money to a fund set up that nationals does not recieve. We don't generally contribute to the national fraternity, unless it is solely philanthropy.
|
Quote:
The insurance and dues thing is one that is very hard to get undergrad membership to focus on. The rates for a large local would have to be astronomical -- with that reflected in the dues which seems to be true in the case you mention. I would think that Phi Gamma Delta would have a copyright (or would it be a service mark?) on the "word" FIJI. I wonder how the breakaway chapter gets away with using it. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.