![]() |
Quote:
Welcome to the discussion....and thanks for your post. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Different organizations "forbid" their pledges/associates from wearing the organizations colors for different reasons. It is sometimes because of the same reason why they can't wear the letters: they don't know the meaning behind them. I personally don't want everyone representing my organization just because their were "picked" from the selection process. Our education process/pledging period is meant to teach our associate members what Zeta Sigma Chi is about and our rules and policies. If you don't know about my organization, how can you promote it? In MY opinion, that would do more harm than good. |
Quote:
Oh and BTW the other day I saw a ZPhiB lady on the military base near here wearing one of those great jackets! :) |
Get one thing first.
I am not trying to besmirch any Greek Organizations! If the NPHC Greeks want to do it their way, that is fine. So I am asking a question of WHY and Why Not, not degrading another Organization. I think everyone should know that about me by now. I am a BIG backer of Greeks, any and all. And I will not take My Letters from my Signature.:) I am proud of any New Associate that joins my Fraterniy and want them all to be Initiated be active and Graduate from College, that is why they are there anyway! |
Quote:
Plus, i would think it would be considered hazing (it is for AXO) to NOT allow the new members to announce they are joining that particular organization. In fact, once they receive a bid, they are considered equal to a sister, and you are supposed to treat her as such. AXO encourages new members to be allowed to wear letters, and it is hazing if you make them do any activity that sisters dont do also... we view it as, we picked you to be a sister, and we're proud of you. We cant forbid new members from doing anything, and we cant make them do anything. Most of the things that are accepted by NPHC standards as part of their program is considered hazing by our National. |
Quote:
Very good post and I agree. We have the samething, a NM isn't allowed to do anything that a sister won't do. We don't tell them this until after the fact, but from the day that a Bid Card is signed, they are considered to be sisters. When this fall's pledge class found that out, I thought they were goign to kill me (I was thre NME) but there is a reason why they don't know it. THe only thing I disagree with (once again, this is my opinion) is letting NM's wear letters before they get in. My pledge sister and I got in on 5/4, pulling on a set of letters to go to class on 5/5 was one of the best feelings in the world, something that I never will forget. I worked hard to earn those letters. We were allowed to wear Sigma Delta Tau, or even SDT, but not SDT and I have to say, I am happy we couldn't. Maybe it's just me but thats how I feel. I don't like wearing things that I don't understand what it means. |
Quote:
Yeah, we had a big issue over this one year-- our CLC advised us, as a recruitment policy, to allow NM to wear stitched letters (screen print was ok in our chapter) but National didnt force us to let them wear them. Most sisters felt the NMs had to wait until initiation but others didnt care. We decided to wait until they were initiated before we let them wear them, more so because the other sororities at our school didnt let their NMs wear letters, and they all knew who our NMs were (by their pledge pins) |
Quote:
But, I see that, once again, we're confronted with the differences b/w BGLOs and those that are not BGLOs. I think it's silly for "pledges" to be wearing letters (and/or for people to wear letters on "bid nights"). Hell, I think the whole concept of "rush" is plain silly. Yet and still, I respect (key word: respect) this system of new membership for non-BGLOs. |
Quote:
Since pledging was LEGAL and ABOVE GROUND, at that time, you witnessed the things that you witnessed. Your memories are a beautiful thing ;) |
Quote:
Right, it's called protocol. |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Pledges wearing letters
Quote:
Even if the pattern is in the organization's colors, there is a general consensus against the use of patterns. Beyond that, floral prints, plaids, Gucci sketch, etc. are plain hideous, to me. |
Quote:
TMI |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Pledges wearing letters
Quote:
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Pledges wearing letters
Quote:
However, seeing those prints in the form of BGLO letters are a definite no-no, to me. For reasons beyond their being ugly. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:35 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.