Quote:
Originally posted by RACooper
Yes - in my capacity as a student monitor for the college administration (required for all meetings from non-college groups).
As for your second comment I have to admit that line of thinking is pretty alien - the level of expection placed upon PNMs already knowing about an org. I'd seriously be flattered if I was approached by someone interested, and I'd be more than happy to share basic open information - I don't know whether this is due to a GLO-cultural difference, or a difference in the general knowledge of GLOs in our respective regions.
|
Wolfman already commented on this, but because there are only four NPHC orgs for women and five for men, and because there's so much graduate activity (and intake!) in HBGLO chapters, the chances of a PNM for a HBGLO already knowing about the orgs is quite high. If they haven't been paying attention, the likelihood of them knowing *someone* in their families, communities, etc. in those orgs is high. I also think that the NPHC orgs seem a little more standardized in their recruitment approaches. I'd think for many of them, the informationals are more like a formal open house for the org (and please correct me if I have misunderstood), while rush is like recruitment but by invitation only, with the understanding that one is invited because one has discreetly done his or her homework.
On the other hand, the NIC and other men's fraternities, and the NPC sororities and women's fraternities, can be very different and have extremely different recruitment styles varying from campus to campus. Some can take freshmen right away; some can't. Some are very open with parts of ritual, others say they won't comment on their ritual, and still others won't confirm or deny whether there even *is* a ritual!
As far as NPHC colonizing on a campus, it's not that different from the NIC or NPC in terms of disclosing secret information. Sig Eps won't reveal a password, ADPis won't comment on a grip, and Sinfonians won't discuss what kind of space they're going to need to properly carry out their ritual. So why do you expect the NPHC to divulge more than they usually will, if our HWGLOs don't do any differently? Orgs are contacted for expansion, or an interest group tries to get campus to allow a new org, and the information that's *usually* publicly available is made publicly available in sessions to promote interest.
I will say that the NPHC members here who have been able to convey respect when answering or redirecting boneheaded questions (ones that I, too, often would like to know the answers to!), have gained my respect. We non-NPHCer don't always *know* that we're being disrespectful, because the culture of NPHC orgs can be very different from ours.
Some of us are curious because we want to know more about the wonderful heritage and strength that your organizations have. I think it'd be great to understand how/whether HWGLOs could create orgs that have the kind of community recognition, lifetime committment, and alumni/ae participation that the NPHC orgs have crafted. And I don't know that we *can*, per se-- it isn't something that can be learned, but more likely something that will need to evolve over time.
My $2.00 (since that's a lot of cents up there!)