![]() |
Re: Supporting the Troops and Not the War
Quote:
Neither mother nor son ever expected him to go to war. " Isn't there something wrong with this statement? This isn't summer camp. The military prepares to serve in a war. I also am not satisfied with her analogy of her mission with that of her son's. They are not both fighting a war. I also don't like how she states that getting arrested was "exhilarating". How can she compare her experience to her son's? -Rudey --And where do you get pilgrim costumes?? |
Rudey, I agree with your previous post. The point of the military is to be prepared for war. Membership is voluntary. If you don't want to potentially fight in a war, don't join the military.
I feel sympathy for the plight of this woman. She is worried about her son whom she loves and wants home. There are thousands of people who have the same feelings about their loved ones. |
Neither mother nor son ever expected him to go to war.
I'm having a little problem with this statement. Do you think the NY City Fire Dept. expected a building to fall on them? What about the police who work in "war zone" neighborhoods? Doctors never expect to be exposed to AIDS by a sharp, but these things all happen-it's part of the risk. If anyone says different, they aren't/weren't looking realistically at the whole picture. Thse situations are very real possibilities To be in the armed service and NOT understand that war is always a possibility-especially in this political climate-is hard to understand. Perhaps if the statement had read "Both mother and son hoped war would not occur..." I think she is doing the best she can do to cope with a heartbreaking and frightening situation. |
The journalist just had an agenda when he/she wrote that...
Note that it's not a quote.. The journalist never interviewed the son. Take that article with a HUGE grain of salt. The mother's perspective in this case is obviously not enough to paint the entire picture. I really don't buy that statement at all. Just an example of crap journalism. |
http://www.coxandforkum.com/archives...mouflage-X.gif
In a CNN report that Oakland antiwar protest gets ugly, the leftists' true anti-American-military nature is revealed: "Direct Action to Stop the War organized the protest against American President Lines, saying the company ships arms and supplies for the U.S. military and is profiting from the war on Iraq." And what exactly do they think would happen to our troops without supplies and arms? In December, The Ayn Rand Institute's Alex Epstein wrote about these Peacenik Warmongers: "There is an increasingly vocal movement that seeks to engage America in ever longer, wider, and more costly wars — leading to thousands and perhaps millions of unnecessary deaths. This movement calls itself the 'anti-war' movement." via Cox & Forkum. |
Okay, I think the point of that one sentence was completely missed.
No one expects to go to war. Everyone who enters the armed services know it's a risk, but it's not as if you expect to be called into war tomorrow. In the case of this man, he's been in the Army for 20 years; a lot of the kids who are going in now don't have a war in their recent memory, nor do they know people who have been personally touched by war. The only reason Gulf War I wasn't a complete blur for me is because of where I lived. There is a difference between knowing the risks involved in a decision and expecting a certain outcome. That's as simplistic as saying, "I drive, therefore I expect to be in an accident." No. You understand the risks involved in driving, that an accident can happen. How does the anti-war movement lead to longer wars? Explain that pearl of wisdom from The Ayn Rand Institute. Don't get me wrong, The Fountainhead was the reason I decided to be an architect, but that think-tank is very reactionary. |
hmmm quite quiet in here.
It took some time to confirm this yesterday, but on March 6th, just a bit over one month ago, anti-war activist and Saddam appeaser Jeanane Garafalo made an appearance on The O’Reilly Factor. O’Reilly took the opportunity to present a “what if” situation to Garafalo. O'Reilly: If you are wrong . . . and if the United States--and they will, this is going to happen--goes in, liberates Iraq [with] people in the street, American flags, hugging our soldiers . . . you gonna apologize to George W. Bush? Garafalo: I would be so willing to say, "I'm sorry." I hope to God that I can be made a buffoon of, that people will say, "You were wrong. You were a fatalist." And I will go to the White House on my knees on cut glass and say, "Hey, you and Thomas Friedman [sic] were right. . . . I shouldn't have doubted you" . . . O'Reilly: Nobody will call you a buffoon because I will protect you. Garafalo: Thank you, sir. One suggestion, Janeane. Make it a pay-per-view event. Raise money for your favorite charity. Janeane Garafalo walking on knees through broken glass. $29.99 tonight on Showtime! via Neal Boortz |
There was a rally at the World Trade Center today in support of the troops. I just saw my neighbor on the news talking about his late son who was murdered on Sept. 11th while working for the FDNY. His daughter is now in the Army. I know that people say that there isn't a correlation between 9/11 and the war in Iraq, but I consider this a part of the war on terrorism. I feel so sad. He was a nice young man who should still be here.
|
I thought this said anti war prostitutes. Hahaha. I'll bang you if you burn a flag LOL
|
Re: Anti-War Protesters....
BUMP
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.