Drolefille |
07-06-2011 07:22 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by BluPhire
(Post 2067887)
But then they would have to sit through sentencing.
Remember one had a cruise this week.
|
She's still getting sentenced. Also, lol u trollin
Quote:
Originally Posted by kiteflyersmom
(Post 2067894)
Oh...and another thing that has bothered me.... Zanny the Nanny- I know she made up the whole nanny things but I wondered if she picked the name as a result of using Zanax to shut the kid up.
And maybe Frog will hit me with another "Obviously" LOL.
|
Sorry, do you even go here?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPhil
(Post 2067897)
LOL.
There are so many questions, some of them are directly related to the case and others are not.
***
That's also why I don't think "common sense" has anything to do with this case, not even extralegally. An attorney on HLN just said "that doesn't seem like common sense." What is considered common sense is subjective. And, more importantly, reasonable doubt weighed more heavily.
ETA: And if I hear one more person on the news say "another O.J. Simpson".... I know the O.J. trial was the first big public murder trial that many people can think of. This is proof positive that people are especially concerned with perceived miscarriages of justice when they think it has hit home---which is essentially what some of us have been saying in this thread.
|
OJ comparisons should go die.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASTalumna06
(Post 2067975)
|
Saw this today. This would be an example of someone with enough at stake, a juror, that a physical reaction makes some sense. I do want to clarify what I said last night with a 'if you're having a physical reaction, it's because you're personalizing this story and need to take five big steps away from the keyboard, TV, and go spend time with family, loved ones, puppies and/or your favorite stuffed animal.'
/was tired last night, not sure if I made the sense I wanted to.
|