Actually, it's not even group membership and guidelines. Depending on where you find your "average college student."

Are GLO members the only collegiate and noncollegiate people who can form sisterhood and brotherhood bonds and adhere to a "moral"/standards/protocol code higher than themselves? No.

A more general definition of "fraternal" lets us know that the bonds, networks, and guidelines that we often speak about have been found in many other places. Hence, GLOs aren't for everybody and many of those who don't join have been able to find a lot of the same benefits elsewhere.

Exactly!

this thread is from 2007. OLD NEWS.

Awwww, flashback to 2007's male "AKAs." I just read my last post and don't know what the hell I was typing about. But I'm sure it was important in 2007. :)

You realize you're bitching at people from 2007, right?

And LOL @ "female AKAs"

Oh. Goodie.

Students please observe the Ironicus Hypocritalus. It is characterized by unwittingly being that which it claims to despise. Key signs are multiple exclamation points, the use of the word "classy" and an insult in the same sentence* and an inability to differentiate between there, their and they're.

*use of the word classy without an insult may indicate another species. We will discuss this at another lecture.