No i was referring to you for all 5 points. No, my opinion is just as important as yours. My post talks about you. As a non-NPC member your opinions are just as valid as an NPHC member.

Des Plaines?

They don't.. I'm just asking. This IS a forum.

Aware of WHAT? That PNAI is a made-up term that is not used by my NPC organization or NPC in general? I'm well aware of that.

I've said it before, Tom, but I must have missed the memo where LXA took charge of dictating what NPC organizations do and what they say about it. Please do a better job educating the NPC on your authority and I am sure we will all just keep our opinions to ourselves once you've done so. Until then, butt out.

Gee, last I checked, this was a forum where people are allowed to ask questions. If you don't want to answer, that is fine. I just find it odd that it was said that "many people" are against discussing it, yet no AIs will step up to the plate. Why is that?

I'll step up.

I DON'T WANT TO DISCUSS AI ON GREEKCHAT BECAUSE PEOPLE LIKE YOU HAVE TAKEN A GREAT THING AND TURNED IT INTO A TRAIN WRECK.

Over the last year or so since I was initiated there have been way too many people coming on here going about things the wrong way, not taking no for an answer and then getting encouraged by people saying "don't worry, try someone else." Hmmm, maybe sorority life isn't for everyone.

It's a pity too since all the "older" AI's on here busted their butts to get where they were and have done a lot for their organizations, the new ones I don't see what they are doing for their groups to better them.

Now when you report me, spell the name right please!!!

KunjaPrincess, I think this post should serve as template post for the many AIs who share in your opinion.

I agree with everything you just said, but it's a shame that my opinion doesn't count because I'm a collegiate initiate.

If your post does get reported, it's a shame because it doesn't merit a report to the AI sub-forum mods and I hope they take note of that. :)

worth repeating!

I'm asking a simple question.. have been cordial and polite... so why the hostility? You know, this is exactly how the "train wreck" starts... the hostile answers to simple questions. Let's put blame where it's due.

Now, can you please clarify? Exactly what is the "wrong way"? and.. who has "not taken no for an answer?" Who said "don't worry, try someone else?"

You see.. when an untruth is told often enough.. people start to believe it.

As an aside.. I wonder if the hostile remarks are purposely started by the people who want to see the AI forum go away.. because they want the trainwrecks in hopes John will do away with it?

I'm curious as to what the "older AIs" have to say regarding their opinions on whether AI should be discussed or not. Any "old AI" want to chime in?

crickets are lovely...

So I guess this means that the "older AIs" are fine then with AI being discussed?

Wonderful.

So nice seeing "You don't have to look at this garbage if you don't want to, because this person is on ignore".

Aren't they though? Maybe we should do the same thing with Earp...

Unfortunatly, you can't put Mods on Ignore.:rolleyes:

I wonder if John could make some sort of Earp-exception. That would make things twice as peaceful as they've been!

I'll step up and echo that same sentiment.